Editorial Standards

Latest News Today maintains rigorous editorial standards. Our team verifies information from trusted sources and provides context to help readers understand complex stories.

Last Updated: Sunday, May 17, 2026 at 04:32 PM
Category: News

Editor's Note

Latest News Today provides comprehensive coverage and analysis of breaking news stories. This article is part of our ongoing coverage of curious definition reasonable flna6C10146571, bringing you verified information from trusted sources with added context and expert perspective.

Why This Matters: Understanding the full context of this story helps readers make informed decisions and stay updated on developments that impact our community.

A curious definition of 'reasonable'

Gina McCarthy, nominated to lead the EPA
Gina McCarthy, nominated to lead the EPAAssociated Press

Gina McCarthy's nomination to lead the EPA probably won't reach the Senate floor until July, and maybe between now and then, her Republican critics can up with better excuses to oppose her nomination than this.

Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said he still couldn't support President Obama's nominee to head the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because she is "stonewalling."

"The job of EPA administrator has the potential to impact the life of every American in both positive and negative ways -- and so I believe she has to be as forthcoming as possible in answering questions," Sessions said Thursday. "To date, she has not provided responsive answers to many of the requests submitted by our ranking member, Sen. [David] Vitter (R-La.), or many of my questions."

The Alabama Republican added that he and his GOP colleagues have made "reasonable requests."

I suppose what is and isn't "reasonable" is a subjective matter, but by any fair standard, Sessions' complaint is hard to take seriously.

As we discussed several weeks ago, BuzzFeed ran an interesting report on the number of questions Senate Republicans have asked McCarthy as part of her confirmation process. How ridiculous has it been? Combine all of the questions submitted for the record by Senate Republicans for the three previous EPA directors. Then double that number. Then double that number again. It still doesn't come close to the 1,079 questions the Senate GOP has submitted to Gina McCarthy.

Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) alone has asked 411 written questions, with 242 subparts. McCarthy answered all of them.

"Reasonable requests?" I don't think so.

In the meantime, an anti-EPA think tank called the Competitive Enterprise Institute has filed a lawsuit related to McCarthy's nomination. Apparently, during her confirmation hearing, McCarthy sent some text messages, and the Competitive Enterprise Institute is going to court, demanding to know what she said to whom. Why? Because maybe the nominee said something the right can use against her.

Don't be too surprised if the McCarthy pushback helps Senate Democrats make the case for the nuclear option this summer.