Meanwhile, the GOP doesn't seem to be loosening their grip on Holder. The House Judiciary Committee now wants to determine if the AG may have lied under oath during his recent testimony before the panel. 
Let the Eric Holder mea culpa tour begin.
The attorney general–whose Justice Department is coming under fire for authorizing subpoenas for journalists’ personal information–is going into damage control mode, meeting with several media organizations this week as part of an agency review that President Obama has mandated. NBC News said it planned to attend the meeting.
The review comes after news surfaced that Holder greenlighted a controversial search warrant for Fox News reporter James Rosen’s private emails over a story he did about North Korea’s nuclear program. The Justice Department is also coming under scrutiny for secretly seizing phone records of Associated Press journalists for an investigation into the leaking of information about a CIA operation in Yemen to stop a bomb plot. In the latter probe, Holder has insisted he recused himself from the matter and that it was his deputy, James Cole, who approved the subpoena.
Obama, who says he was unaware of the DOJ’s practices, has carefully tried to strike a balance between national security concerns and a commitment to a free press. The president said last week that he directed Holder to review the existing guidelines on subpoenas related to reporters and to meet with media organizations to voice their concerns. Holder is expected to report back to the president by July 12.
Obama called on New York Sen. Chuck Schumer earlier this month to reintroduce media shield legislation to protect the press. Schumer announced Sunday that he has formed a new bipartisan “Gang of 8” to draft a media shield law. A bipartisan group in the House has also backed the legislation.
That hasn’t stopped some who have gone as far to call on Holder to resign, including Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus. On Wednesday, Jonathan Turley, a prominent liberal attorney and law professor, also said Holder should be “fired” in a USA Today column.
Turley wrote that Holder has “supervised a comprehensive erosion of privacy rights, press freedom and due process.”
The GOP-led House doesn’t seem to be loosening their grip on Holder.
The House Judiciary Committee now wants to determine whether the attorney general may have lied under oath during his recent testimony before the panel. In a letter sent to Holder on Wednesday, the committee asked Holder to clarify the department’s policy on how it handled search warrants for Rosen, the Fox News reporter.
Two weeks prior—amid revelations that the DOJ targeted the AP—Holder said he had not been personally involved in the potential prosecution of a journalist who made sensitive information public. “With regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something I have ever been involved in, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy,” he said.
Since that testimony, NBC News has reported that Holder approved a search warrant for Rosen’s email. A department official did not immediately return a request for comment.
“How can you claim to have never “been involved” in the potential prosecution of the press but were admittedly involved in discussions regarding Mr. Rosen?” GOP Reps. Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Jim Sensenbrenner of Wisconsin wrote in the letter.
A source close to Holder told Politico that looking back, the attorney general regrets parts of the investigation involving Rosen and in regard to the AP probe, the DOJ may have took in more phone lines than necessary.